TRADITIONS AND INNOVATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF LEGAL FACTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18372/2307-9061.45.12265Keywords:
legal regulation, legal model of circumstances, legal relations, functions of legal facts, legal factAbstract
Purpose: theoretical development of the definition of a legal fact by considering traditional and modern approaches to understanding the concept and essence of this legal phenomenon. Nature, place and role of legal facts have been defined on the basis of the analysis of various scientific ideas about the evolution of legal facts. Methods: the use of the dialectical method of scientific knowledge and abstraction method allowed to analyze the content of the concept under study, to distinguish the main, most significant features and properties of legal facts that differentiate them from other social phenomena and distinguish them between legal ones. The functions of legal facts, their system-forming and regulatory potential for a legal system, as well as socio-economic significance in the process of transformation of social life have been defined with the help of the system-structural method and method of generalization. Results: the results of the scientific research prove the specificity of legal facts, which consists in the fact that they are phenomena of socio-legal reality and have material and normative components. Generalization of the features of a legal fact and research of its definition made it possible to determine a legal fact as an individual legal model of social circumstances, which is fixed in a certain legal way, serves as the basis for the emergence and functioning of legal relations, as well as the specification of the subjective rights and obligations of the participants in these relations. Simultaneous reflection of four planes – actual, personal, normative and communicative – reveals the content of legal facts more fully in this definition. Discussion: powerful development of the philosophy of law, the philosophical basis of various legal sciences and the directions of interdisciplinary research in the last decades requires further scientific understanding of legal facts using the philosophical approaches inherent in phenomenology, hermeneutics, praxeology and other philosophical systems. Thus, the necessity of working out of the corresponding methodological tools, which, taking into account the double legal and social nature of legal facts, would cover a considerable range of different scientific approaches, methods, methodological principles, etc., is actualized.
References
Savigny F. System des heutigen romshen Rechts. T. III. – 2nd ed., rev. – Published: Clark. N.J.: Lawbook Exhange, 2003. – 347 r.
Maiorka K. Fatto giuridico – fattispecie. – Novissimo digesto Italiano, Diretto da Antonio Asara e Ernesto Eula, 1981. – Vol.7. – 217 p.
Paralegal's Encyclopedic Dictionary. – N.Y., Prentice-Hall, 1979. – 237 p.
Teoriya derzhavy i prava: pidruch. dlya stud. yuryd. vyshch. navch. zakl. / [O.V. Petryshyn, S.P. Pohrebnyak, V.S. Smorodyns'kyy ta in.]; za red. O.V. Petryshyna. – Kh.: Pravo, 2014. – S. 240.
Pleniuk M. The concept and features of legal facts in the doctrine of law of obligations / M. Pleniuk // Evropský politický a právní diskurz. – 2016. – Svazek 3. – 2. vydání. S. 126-131.
Kostruba A.V. Ponyattya yurydychnykh faktiv ta yikh oznaky v tsyvil'nomu pravi Ukrayiny / A.V. Kostruba // Chasopys Kyyivs'koho universytetu prava. – 2011. – # 1. – S. 169.
Zahal'na teoriya prava: Pidruchnyk / Za zah. red. M.I. Kozyubry. – K.: Vaite, 2015. – C. 233
Teoriya derzhavy i prava: navch. posib. dlya pidhot. fakhivtsiv z informatsiynoyi bezpeky / [O.O. Tykhomyrov, M.M. Mikulina, Yu.A. Ivanov ta in.]; za zah. red. L.M. Strel'byts'koyi. – Kyyiv: Kondor Vydavnytstvo, 2016. – C. 193.
Mel'nyk O.H. Ponyattya yurydychnykh faktiv yak pidstav vynyknennya, prypynennya ta transformatsiyi pravovykh vidnosyn u sferi realizatsiyi sudovoyi vlady / O.H. Mel'nyk // Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods'koho natsional'noho universytetu. – 2015. – Vypusk 33. – Tom 1. – S. 33-34.
Shyshka R.B. Hospodars'ko-pravove rehulyuvannya suspil'nykh vidnosyn v Ukrayini: monohrafiya / R.B. Shyshka. – K.: «MP Lesya», 2015. – S. 60.
Sobchuk Yu.H. Yurydychni fakty v mekhanizmi pravovoho rehulyuvannya vidnosyn neplatospromozhnosti bankiv / Yu.H. Sobchuk // Pravovyy visnyk Ukrayins'koyi akademiyi bankivs'koyi spravy. – 2012. – # 1 (6). – S. 106.
Kozlovs'ka L.V. Funktsiyi yurydychnykh faktiv u dynamitsi pidstav spadkovykh pravovidnosyn / L. V.Kozlovs'ka // Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorods'koho natsional'noho universytetu. Seriya : Pravo. – 2015. – Vyp. 30(1). – S. 133-134.
Shopina I.M. Administratyvno-pravove rehulyuvannya upravlinnya orhanamy vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrayiny: Monohrafiya / I.M. Shopina. – K.: «MP Lesya», 2011. – S. 149.
Shafalovych A.A. Novatsyy v teoryy yurydycheskykh faktov v svete razvytyya pravovoy systemы Respublyky Belarus' / A.A. Shafalovych // Nauchnыe trudы Belorusskoho hosudarstvennoho эkonomycheskoho unyversyteta: yubyleynыy sbornyk. Vyp. 6 / M-vo obrazovanyya Resp. Belarus', Belorusskyy hos. эkon. un-t; [redkol.: V.N. Shymov (pred.) y dr.]. – Mynsk: BHЭU, 2013. – S. 532-537.
Kel'man M.S. Zahal'na teoriya derzhavy i prava: pidruchnyk / M.S. Kel'man. – K.: Kondor-Vydavnytstvo, 2016. – S. 416.
Kalyuzhnyy R.A. Normatyvni yurydychni fakty ta yikh rol' u protsesi transformatsiyi suspil'nykh vidnosyn / R.A. Kalyuzhnyy, L.O. Shapenko // Derzhavo- ta pravotvorchi tradytsiyi ukrayins'koho narodu (do 150-richchya M.S. Hrushevs'koho): [materialy III Vseukrayins'koyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi, m. Irpin', 23 lystopada 2016 r.]. – Vinnytsya: «Nilan-LTD», 2017. – S. 28-29.
